C. S. Lewis’s We Have No Right To Happiness :: We Have No Right To Happiness

Everybody in this world has the unspoiled to rapture. However, I dont see we should render our happiness by all means. I dont determine that people should be selfish in order to get whatever they want. Im not saying that thither arnt any(prenominal) selfish people in this world, but some people are more selfish than differents. So we need to have some residue in what we want and what would have got us happy. Also we need to make sure that we dont burden ourselves for the sake of others happiness. Therefore, Im not convinced that Mr. A and Mrs. B did the right thing also, I know that sometimes we may give up our right to happiness to please others, and sometimes we have to do whatever it takes to meet our happiness.First, I didnt harmonise with Mr. A and Mrs. Bs actions in C. S. Lewiss essay, We Have No Right To Happiness. Therefore, I dont think that Mr. A should have left his wife because she was not beautiful any more. Of course, maybe there is another side of the sto ry that made him commit his wife. Also I didnt think that Mrs. B should leave her husband, when he lost everything. However, the way Lewis presented his story is to convince me that they are very high-risk people. Overall, they justify their behavior simply by saying they have the right to happiness. Even though Lewis presented them very badly in his story, Im not in a position to judge others actions. However, Im not totally convinced that these are the people to leave their spouses. So no matter where they go, they may still find the same situation. Because that is carriage, and life can change any time.I also know that sometimes I need to give up my right of happiness for others. For example, there was a human beings on a boat along with other men. And there was a quarrel on the boat. As a result, everyone was wedded a place. So the man decided to dig a reparation at his place, justifying that by saying that is his right and place. So if they allowed him, they all would be in danger. And if they prevented him, they would have denied his right .In this case, I personally think that man should give up his right for the sake of others. Of course, you may not agree or consider the right to dig a hole at that mans place, but