Consider and discuss the following statement: "In any organizational change it is inevitable that there will be 'winners' and 'losers'; conflict between individuals and groups is only to be expected."

Today?s organizations become more(prenominal) complex, ambiguous and more unpredictable, it is experiencing strange motley and transformation in all sectors. change has and so become a way of life the public over. The companies essentialness to be susceptible and ready to acknowledge the challenges that change presents with and buckle under to overcome these for the benefit of the comp whatever as a whole. However, is it unavoidable that there will be ?winners? or ? nod offrs? in all organizational change, conflict amongst individuals and groups is only to be expect? To manage this question, firstly this essay will talk close to some(prenominal) key concepts and theories that relate to organizational change, it will ease us to understand this question deeply, and easier to start the discussion in the incoming; after that, I will try to puzzle turn out who will be winners or losers and discuss how to list the wining and lose in change, why they become winners or lo sers; at last, I will talk about the conflict between individuals and groups in the organizational change. Organizational change butt joint be described as the process of moving away from a current condition to realize some future charge up (Nickols, 2004). it can be in response to external forces, such(prenominal) as market shifts, competitive pressures, and technological innovations, or it can be internally motivated, such as by managers difficult to change existing methods and practices. Regardless of its origins, change does affect wad and their relationships in organizations.

Otherwise, what argon the leve ls of change? Refer to smith (2007), who id! entifies seven-spot non-progressive levels of change:Effectiveness---doing the right thingsEfficiency---doing the right things rightImproving---doing things betterCutting---doing away with somethingCopying---doing things others are doingDifferent---doing things no unity else is doingImpossible---doing things that can not be doneWhile all levels are beneficial, Smith states that ?effectiveness? and ?efficiency? represent normal thinking, ? improving? represents... If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper